JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 13, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger

✓Claimant Sierra Porto Humberto Antonio·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaracion Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por cuanto se pretende que la Corte resuelva consulta
  • Procedencia excepcional
  • Requisitos
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-541/23.

Luego de analizar los argumentos del memorialista concluyó la Corte que debía RECHAZARSE, por no cumplir con la carga argumentativa necesaria para resolver esta clase de peticiones.

Lo anterior, (i) porque no logró demostrar que la providencia tuviera conceptos ambiguos, confusos o que generan dudas sobre la decisión sustancial; (ii) porque la aclaración pedida sugiere elementos marginales o aislados de la parte motiva y resolutiva de la providencia que tienen relación con los efectos jurídicos de la decisión; y (iii) porque lo pretendido excede el ámbito procedimental de una solicitud de aclaración y desconoce que la Corte no puede absolver consultas de las decisiones que emite en el marco de sus competencias constitucionales.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaración a la sentencia C-541 de 2023 por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. ADVERTIR al peticionario que contra esta providencia no proceden recursos.
  3. Comuníquese y cúmplase.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.